In such one declares that 'magical-effects' must be a catagory of at least one entity. Effects like the Bodak's death gaze pretty much confirm it. The use of 'magical-effects' leads one to immediatly conclude that this indeed must have been added for a purpose. The books completely fail to use these tags at all. If your definition is flawed one must return to the descriptionĪs such that is what one does, where you could say 'death' spell mean those labled with only the tags, legitimately as SPELLS are given such tags, magical effects most defintely does NOT have this limitation. Since your defintion does not hold up to example, it must be flawed. Which appraently, according to you, effects undead and constructs! The Behir's breath weapon is not really lighting because it does not have the tag. Not the Allip's babble, as though it says 'mind affecting' it isn't in tags. Not the aboleths Enslave, which can obviously effect those immune to mind effecting powers, as it doesn't state it is one Now considering that, and that no supernatural effects ever have tags. Please point to the line of the spell that states only those effects with the descriptor.Īs it is that Symbol of Death (in its name) that blatently kills in all ways just like every other death spell, is also not a death spell.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |